Gas turbines
The fastest dispatchable power for AI data centers — and only three makers globally. Backlogs stretch ~5 years, with delivery slots already selling into 2030.
Most coverage stops at the chips. We go one layer down, to the things the chips cannot ship without: advanced packaging, high-bandwidth memory, grid power, transformers, cooling, and the raw materials underneath all of it. These are the constraints that set the real pace of the buildout.
Every chokepoint carries a Tightness Gauge, scored entirely from public data and dated to its source. As conditions shift, the gauge moves, so you can see where the next squeeze is forming before it reaches the headlines.
The buildout moves at the speed of its tightest link.
Every forecast for the AI buildout is written in GPUs. It's the wrong unit.
The fastest dispatchable power for AI data centers — and only three makers globally. Backlogs stretch ~5 years, with delivery slots already selling into 2030.
The heavy iron that steps power up and down for the grid. Lead times have blown out to ~5 years — under 10% of data-center cost, but effectively 100% of the bottleneck.
The single source of the world's most advanced transistors. TSMC's N2 is sold out through 2026 with orders pushing into 2028 — and there is no real second supplier at the leading edge.
HBM is cannibalizing the DRAM wafer pool: makers are pouring capacity into high-margin AI memory, dragging conventional server DRAM into a sold-out supercycle with the steepest price increases in over a decade.
The gate on every advanced AI accelerator shipped — if a chip needs HBM, it needs CoWoS, and capacity is effectively sold out.
Power is now the binding constraint on the AI buildout — ahead of chips. The bottleneck has migrated from the server rack to the substation, with interconnection queues and heavy electrical gear taking years.
Every sub-7nm logic chip and advanced DRAM is patterned on an EUV scanner, and ASML is the only company on earth that builds them — a textbook monopoly whose finite output rate is the hard ceiling on leading-edge capacity worldwide.
Hyperscalers are designing their way around Nvidia with bespoke accelerators — but only two firms can co-design them at scale, and they all funnel through the same TSMC nodes and CoWoS slots.
The memory that makes an accelerator usable — stacked DRAM bonded beside the GPU. Bandwidth, not compute, is the binding constraint, and supply is sold out across all three makers through 2026.
The interconnect that wires GPU clusters together — roughly six per GPU. 800G is running well below demand, and Nvidia spent $4B locking up the laser supply.
The passive silicon slab that wires HBM to logic inside CoWoS is reticle-limited and eats TSMC wafer capacity — so as AI packages balloon past reticle size, usable interposers per wafer collapse and packaging can't scale faster.
AI accelerators need far larger, higher-layer-count substrates than any prior chip, and a five-firm oligopoly is heading back into shortage on what suppliers call a three-year super-cycle.
Every new fab is built from tools made by a handful of segment monopolists, and the AI cycle (leading-edge logic + DRAM/HBM + advanced packaging) is driving a higher-intensity WFE wave with long lead times that gates how fast capacity can come online.
Above ~30–50 kW per rack, air cooling fails — so next-gen GPUs make liquid cooling mandatory, not optional. This is a fast transition more than a hard shortage.
A two-speed market: AI-grade ultra-flat 300mm for 2/3nm is tightening even as legacy 200mm softens — so headline 'wafer demand' masks a real squeeze on exactly the wafers AI needs, sitting on a five-firm oligopoly with multi-quarter qualification moats.